DTN.ORG Home DTN.ORG User's Guide Search DTN.ORG Complete Database Contact DTN.ORG Officials Moonbat Central

RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM: GOALS, WORLDVIEW, AND TACTICS

This section of DiscoverTheNetworks explores the worldviews, activities, and agendas of radical environmentalism, a movement whose goal is not the advancement of human health, human happiness, and human life, but rather the creation of a world where "nature" is deemed to have "intrinsic value" that ought to be revered for its own sake, irrespective of any benefit to mankind. Radical environmentalists espouse "deep ecology," which asserts that the environment is an end in itself and that man is an intruder -- if not a rapist and despoiler -- who should have no greater priority than any other species. From this axiom, they reason that any human action that changes the environment is necessarily immoral.

Notably, radical environmentalists invoke the doctrine of intrinsic value not against wolves that eat sheep, or beavers that gnaw trees; they invoke it only against man, only when man wants to use natural resources for the advancement of some business endeavor. Thus they tend to reflexively oppose the pursuit of such endeavors as oil exploration, logging, housing development, and all manner of commerce.

A logical corollary to this view is the premise that free-market economic systems are inherently plagued by greed and by a willingness to exploit the environment to whatever degree is necessary for maximum profit, without regard for any resultant ecological harm. Consequently, a hallmark of radical environmentalism is its hostility to capitalism and its embrace of socialism as a preferred economic model.

It is imperative to distinguish radical environmentalism from conservationism -- the rational, or conservative, brand of environmentalism that rejects any and all gratuitous or preventable damage to the natural world. Conservationism is committed to minimizing air pollution, water pollution, the destruction of natural ecosystems, and the unnecessary depletion of natural resources. By the same token, however, it understands that the potential benefits of progress and industry (conducted in an environmentally responsible manner) may sometimes justify mankind's manipulation/exploitation of landscapes, forests, rivers, mineral reserves, etc.  Robert Locke's "The Right Conservative Position on the Environment" does an excellent job of distinguishing between radical environmentalism and conservationism.

Radical environmentalism talks eloquently of the purification of air and water, and is sincerely concerned with these issues. But its ultimate goal, the one it believes must be achieved for environmental purity finally to be realized, is the demolition of the West’s industries and the technology that drives them, and the cultivation of a world where "Nature" becomes a surrogate religion.

Radical environmentalists have made "development" an evil word. They work to inhibit or prohibit the harnessing of Alaskan oil, offshore oil, nuclear power, coal -- and every other practical form of energy. They oppose construction projects that would lead to more housing, commerce, and jobs -- in favor of the "rights" of spotted owls, snail darters and other purportedly endangered species. They would sacrifice medical research that extends and improves the quality of human life to the "rights" of mice and other laboratory animals. They "protect" the environment from the industry that is a quintessential human activity and from man himself, whom they consider a rapist and despoiler in his soul.

According to writer Michael Berliner:

"The expressed goal of environmentalism is to prevent man from changing his environment, from intruding on nature. That is why environmentalism is fundamentally anti-man. Intrusion is necessary for human survival. Only by intrusion can man avoid pestilence and famine. Only by intrusion can man control his life and project long-range goals. Intrusion improves the environment, if by 'environment' one means the surroundings of man -- the external material conditions of human life."

The misanthropy at the heart of radical environmentalism is well  expressed by biologist David M. Graber, who, in a glowing review of Bill McKibben's The End of Nature, writes: "Human happiness [is] not as important as a wild and healthy planet…. Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."

The late Michael Crichton said in 2003 that environmentalism had become “one of the most powerful religions in the Western World” and “the religion of choice for urban atheists.” Crichton was referring the fact that radical environmentalists tend to regard their most deeply held beliefs as articles of faith, rather than as science: “Increasingly," he wrote, “it seems facts aren't necessary, because the tenets of environmentalism are all about belief. It's about whether you are going to be a sinner, or saved. Whether you are going to be one of the people on the side of salvation, or on the side of doom. Whether you are going to be one of us, or one of them."

Another hallmark of radical environmentalism is its scientific thuggery, a trait that was exhibited during the so-called "Climategate" scandal that erupted in late November 2009. At the heart of the controversy was the fact that a number of leading American and British climatologists who held that mankind's industrial activity was causing a dangerous warming trend in the earth's atmosphere, had intentionally manipulated the evidence in order to provide "proof" that their warnings were justified. The scientists' deceptions were discovered when hundreds of their private email messages and documents were obtained and publicized by computer hackers.


Portions of this piece are adapted from "The Scourge of Earth Day," authored by Michael Berliner and published by FrontPageMag.com on April 22, 2005.

 

RESOURCES:

Getting the Environment Right: Conservative Environmentalism
By The Sutherland Institute
April 29, 2010

Radical Environmentalism (See pages 1326-1333)
By The University of Florida College of Liberal Arts and Sciences

The Shocking True Story of How Global Warming Became the Biggest #FakeNews Scare of All Time (Pt 1)
By James Delingpole
February 28, 2018

Let's Follow the Climate Money
By Paul Driessen
December 29, 2018

AOC Says America Should Lead the World
By Paul Driessen
February 17, 2019

Big Oil Goes Big Green
By David Wojick
May 3, 2019

Fear, Loathing, Intolerance -- and Worse
By Paul Driessen
May 14, 2019

Climate Chaos Claims Continue Causing Consternation
By Paul Driessen
March 31, 2018

Those Fraudulent Climate Litigation Shakedowns
By Paul Driessen
March 8, 2017

Agitators, Regulators and Predators on the Prowl
By Paul Driessen
October 28, 2017

Keystone Is Anti-hydrocarbon Zealotry In Microcosm
By Paul Driessen
December 9, 2017

Reducing Antiquities Act Land Grabs
By Paul Driessen
December 16, 2017

Politicized Sustainability Threatens Planet and People
By Paul Driessen
October 7, 2017

Now It's a War on Pipelines
By Paul Driessen
September 23, 2017

Life in Fossil-fuel-free Utopia
By Paul Driessen
August 12, 2017

Rolling Back Environmental Progress?
By Paul Driessen
December 3, 2016

We Should Be Glad the US Is Out
By Paul Driessen and David R. Legates
June 25, 2017

US Funding Dubious Science and Unfounded Fear
By Ron Arnold
June 28, 2017

Shameless Fear-mongering -- Versus Reality
By Paul Driessen
August 6, 2017

Ignorance, Intolerance, Violence
By Paul Driessen
April 30, 2017

Would You Bet Your Paycheck on a Weather Forecast?
By Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris
November 29, 2017

UN Agency to Congress: Drop Dead
By Paul Driessen
December 2, 2017

Blatant Blue State Hypocrisy
By Paul Driessen
January 13, 2018

Environmentalism Is the New Racism
By Daniel Greenfield
November 27, 2013

How Private Property Is Being Abolished in America (Video Presentation)
By TakingLiberty.us
2005
 
Environmentalism for the 21st Century
By Patrick Moore
2000

Remarks to the Commonwealth Club
By Michael Crichton
September 15, 2003

Environmentalism As Religion
By Joel Garreau
Summer 2010
 
Environmentalism: Return to Eden, or Ticket to Hell?
By Kathleen Marquardt
2005

The Immorality of Environmentalism
By David Gelernter
Autumn 1996
 
The Death of Environmentalism: Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World
By Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhause
October 2004

When Activism Kills
By Bruce Thornton
September 18, 2014

Earth Day's Anti-Human Agenda
By Michael Berliner
April 21, 2004

Why Politicized Science Is Dangerous
By Michael Crighton

The Green Counter-Establishment: How It Holds Power
By Bonner R. Cohen
June 6, 2006
 
"Energy Independence" A Formula For Attacking Energy Production
By James Dellinger
January 2007

Little Green Monsters, Part 1: Advocates for the West and Other State and Local Environmental Groups Push the Policy Envelope
By Kevin Mooney
January 2011
 
Little Green Monsters, Part 2: Louisiana Green Groups Promote “Big Green Easy”
By Kevin Mooney
July 2011

Little Green Monsters, Part 3: Chris Christie & The New Jersey Green Machine
By Kevin Mooney
November 2011
 
Do We Have the Will to Drill? Environmentalists' New Strategy to Kill Energy Exploration
By Danny Smith
September 2008
 
Energy Policy for Environmentalists
By Cheryl K. Chumley
July 1, 2007

Environmentalism and Human Sacrifice
By Dennis Prager
February 26, 2013

How Environmentalists Cause War and Repression
By Daniel Greenfield
June 19, 2011

Frightening Quotes from Environmentalists
By PushBack.com


VIDEO:

The Dangerous Green Agenda & How You Can Fight Back
By Ann McElhinney
2011


LINK:

Property and Environment Research Center

 

Click here to view a sample Profile.

Since Feb 14, 2005 --Hits: 61,630,061 --Visitors: 7,024,052

Copyright 2003-2015 : DiscoverTheNetworks.org